🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". A law may be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," stated the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain figures to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, other nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this global discussion continues, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that states globally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.