🔗 Share this article

It has been described as among the biggest deceptions of its type in the Britain.

Altogether 14 people have been found guilty for their role in a multi-million pound scheme to swindle over 3,500 holiday ownership owners.

The affected individuals were keen to exit long-standing timeshare contracts and went looking for assistance.

The majority were in the age range of 60 and 80. More than 500 of them parted with more than £10,000, and one paid over £80,000.

Those targeted were exposed to aggressive presentations extending for six hours. They were financially worse off, holding worthless fake "points" and remained locked into expensive timeshare contracts they frequently were unable to use.

The Company Behind the Deception

The company at the heart of the scam was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took customers' funds to support the proprietors' lavish lifestyle of exclusive education, luxury homes and private jets.

The man at the head of the company, Mark Rowe, was handed a seven and a half year prison term in January for fraudulent conspiracy.

Recently, his wife one of the co-defendants was among the last group to hear their sentences.

She received a two-year long deferred imprisonment at Southwark Crown Court after confessing to financial crime.

The outcome represents a lengthy process and signifies a huge win for the victims who came forward, the police and prosecutors.

The Way the Investigation Was Initiated

The initial awareness of the firm came in the mid-2016. The position was in the investigations unit of a news organization, making investigative shows.

A friend noted that his mother had inherited the ownership of a timeshare apartment in the Spanish coast and, after decades of vacations, had commenced searching to exit the agreement.

It's worth mentioning how widespread timeshares had grown with British holidaymakers in the last decades of the 20th century.

Vacation properties enabled people to access the identical property each season, or exchange their vacation periods with fellow investors who had properties in other resorts. About 600,000 holiday enthusiasts seized that opportunity.

The initial boom was linked to a numerous reports about dishonest operators deceptively promoting investments. They became a staple on public interest TV programmes.

The common vacation property deal tied investors in for long periods.

In that period, those holders who had enjoyed their assigned property in the sun for 20 or 30 years were getting older, and a significant number were hoping to say farewell to their timeshares.

Some had health issues and were unable to visit their apartments. Others just felt they'd got all they wanted from them. And some had deceased, in numerous instances bequeathing their loved ones to inherit the contracts - including their yearly fees and upkeep costs.

The Investigation Progresses

And that's where the family member had ended up. She browsed the internet for solutions and discovered the organization, a enterprise whose online presence promised to release her from her deal.

But, having made a payment and booked a meeting with them, her relatives had doubts.

Further research revealed numerous individuals claiming they had submitted funds and received no benefit in return. Actually, they had suffered financially. A lot of it.

The investigative unit commenced probing what was going on. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters operating in the timeshare resale sector.

A legal professional had numerous client reports waiting to sue SMT.

The team interviewed clients who had engaged the company and they each reported similar experiences. They thought the firm would buy their property away from them but when they attended a meeting (for which they paid up front) they were advised there was no re-sale value.

Instead, they were encouraged - actually compelled - to spend more money acquiring "Monster Rewards", linked to the outfit's parent company, the overarching entity.

What exactly these were was not exactly clear. They appeared to be a form of credit, offering reduced-price holidays and amenities and consumer discounts.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with additional holders, some time down the line.

Paying cash up front now would lead to an eventual payoff that would pay for SMT's fees and leave the timeshare holder with a gain, liberated eventually from their pesky deal.

Too good to be true? Indeed, it was.

A 'Bait-and-Switch Scheme'

Based on these descriptions were true, this was a large-scale fraud.

It's what is called a "bait-and-switch."

Someone - in this case the organization - "baits" the customer by marketing a defined offering only to then say that's not available, pushing the client to a different, lower-quality offering.

That's illegal. Equipped with all the accounts we had gathered, we presented the rationale to secretly film one of the organization's sessions.

Such an operation demands time, effort, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to collect the data necessary to prove wrongdoing.

Armed with that permission, our small team set up a consultation with one of the organization's staff in the location.

Pretending to be a ordinary individual hoping to assist his parent free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement